Research
Down syndrome is “a developmental
abnormality characterized by trisomy of human chromosome 21" (Nelson
619). The extra copy of chromosome-21 leads to an over expression of
certain genes located on chromosome-21.
Research by Arron et al. shows that
some of the phenotypes associated with Down Syndrome can be related
to the dysregulation of transcription factors (596), and in particular,
NFAT. NFAT is controlled in part by two proteins, DSCR1 and DYRK1A;
these genes are located on chromosome-21 (Epstein 582). In people with
Down Syndrome, these proteins have 1.5 times greater concentration than
normal (Arron et al.. 597). The elevated levels of DSCR1 and DYRK1A
keep NFAT primarily located in the cytoplasm rather than in the nucleus,
preventing NFATc from activating the transcription of target genes and
thus the production of certain proteins (Epstein 583).
This dysregulation was discovered by
testing in transgenic mice that had segments of their chromosomes duplicated
to simulate a human chromosome-21 trisomy (Arron et al.. 597). A test
involving grip strength showed that the genetically modified mice had
a significantly weaker grip, much like the characteristically poor muscle
tone of an individual with Down Syndrome (Arron et al.. 596). The mice
squeezed a probe with a paw and displayed a .2 newton weaker grip (Arron
et al.. 596). Down syndrome is also characterized by increased socialization.
When modified and unmodified mice were observed for social interaction,
the modified mice showed as much as 25% more interactions as compared
to the unmodified mice (Arron et al.. 596).
The genes that may be responsible for
the phenotypes associated may be located proximal to 21q22.3. Testing
by Olson et al. in transgenic mice show the duplicated genes presumed
to cause the phenotypes are not enough to cause the exact features.
While the mice had sections of multiple genes duplicated to approximate
a human chromosome-21 triplication, they only showed slight craniofacial
abnormalities (688-690). The transgenic mice were compared to mice that
had no gene duplication by measuring distances on various points on
their skeletal structure and comparing them to the normal mice (Olson
et al.. 687). The exact characteristics of Down Syndrome were not observed,
so more genes involved for Down Syndrome phenotypes have to be located
elsewhere.
Reeves et al., using 250 clones of
chromosome-21 and specific gene markers, were able to map the gene in
mutated bacteria. The testing had 99.7% coverage of the gene with 99.9995%
accuracy due to multiple redundancies in the mapping techniques. In
the study 225 genes were identified (311-313).
The search for major genes that may
be involved in Down syndrome symptoms is normally in the region 21q21–21q22.3.
However, studies by Reeves et al.. show that 41% of the genes on chromosome-21
have no functional purpose, and only 54% of functional genes have a
known protein sequence. Functionality of genes was determined by a computer
using exon prediction analysis (312). Exon sequence was obtained by
the same procedures of the chromosome-21 mapping.
Research has led to an understanding
that two genes located on chromosome-21, that code for proteins that
control gene regulators, DSCR1 and DYRK1A can be responsible for some
of the phenotypes associated with Down Syndrome. DSCR1 and DYRK1A cannot
be blamed outright for the symptoms; there are a lot of genes that have
no known purpose. Much more research would be needed to produce any
appropriate or ethically acceptable treatment options.
Recent
use of transgenic mice to study specific genes in the Down syndrome
critical region has yielded some results. APP[45] is an Amyloid beta
A4 precursor protein. It is suspected to have a major role in cognitive
difficulties.Another gene, ETS2[47] is Avian Erythroblastosis Virus
E26 Oncogene Homolog 2. Researchers have "demonstrated that over-expression
of ETS2 results in apoptosis. Transgenic mice over-expressing ETS2 developed
a smaller thymus and lymphocyte abnormalities, similar to features observed
in Down syndrome."
Vitamin supplements, in particular
supplemental antioxidants and folinic acid, have been shown to be ineffective
in the treatment of Down syndrome